Claimants: Deborah Muzon & Benjamin Jannis (of University of C.)
Application No: 16/702,456
Publication Date: 02/15/2015
Scientific Fields: Physics >> Astrophysics >> Planetary Sciences
The above claimants assert that, according to their knowledge, they are the first to
conceive the ideas & discoveries recited hereinafter:
A. Formal Claims 1 to 5:
Claim 1: We claim the discovery of a new planet in the solar system of Alfa55 star, wherein:
the planet appears to move on a circular trajectory about Alfa55,
the plane of the trajectory being about 60% to the observation direction, and
the trajectory having a radius between 3 to 4 light years.
Claim 2: We claim the discovery of a gaseous atmosphere on the planet recited by claim 1,
wherein:
said gaseous atmosphere appears to include about 60% sulfur dioxiede, 20% oxygen, 15%
nitrogen and 5% carbon dioxide;
the temperature of said atmosphere appears to be between 410K to 540K;
the pressure of said atmosphere appears to be about 5 times larger than the earth
atmospheric pressure.
see all claims
B. Detailed description of the discoveries & ideas recited by priority-claims
(download files):
Detailed Description | Claims | Drawings | Abstract
C. Contribution of each of the claimants
1.
Deborah Muzon’s contribution to the claimed procedures: click to see description
2.
Benjamin Jannis contribution to the claimed procedures: click to see description
D. Claimants, priority-date, & supporting evidence for each claim:
Priority-Claim
Claim No: 16/702,456
Discovery of a new planet in the solar system of Alfa55 star, the new planet having
a gaseous atmosphere similar to the earth
Peer Review & Rating:
E. Public Forum (comments, challenges,
and prior-art submissions):
1.
Comment-1 (04-15-2015)
2.
Comment-2 (06-20-2015)
3.
Priority account doc (02-04-2016)
4.
Comment-3 (03-12-2016)
5.
Journal Article (03-12-2016)
6.
Priority account doc2 (03-27-2016)
... see complete list
Submit documents & comments relevant
to the validity of these priority-claims:
F. Peer Review & Examination
•
Reciprocal Peer Review (How it works?)
•
Fee based peer review
•
Examination Report
Reviewers provided prior-art search engines
specialized on non-patentable ideas and
discoveries
•
Ratings & Scores:
Predicted value to society: 8
Scientific achievement: 7
Creativity: 9
G. Automatic Examination Engines
(in the not so remote future)
•
Algorithm for performing automatic
examination (similar to “ORIGAMI”)
H. Quick Rating
likes (145)
dislikes (23)
Copyright
©
Jerry Comanescu, 2015
Contact: Jerry Comanescu, comanescu68@gmail.com, Tel: 202-754-2064
World Registry of New Ideas